|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Pierre pinoncelli
Destroyer of the Duchamp Urinal
He’s 77 and Back. By Pierre Doze
January 6th 2006, he did it again. The
artist and performer known as Pinoncelli, now 77, successfully
attacked the Duchamp Fountain (urinal) with a hammer, while on
display at the immense Dada exhibition at the Centre Pompidou
in Paris. This former manager of a flower seeds factory in
south east France still manages to bring on uneasiness in
certain people. As a joke, I told Laurent Lebon, Pompidou
Center’s curator of the Dada show, that Pinoncelli had
already bought his plane ticket to Washington, where the same
Dada will be on view from February 19th. He was stunned and not
amused. Laurent Lebon actually received a long threatening
letter from Pinoncelli as the exhibition opened in Paris:
considering it as an insult not to be mentioned next to
Duchamp as co-author of the Fountain exhibited (in reference to
a performance he conducted in 1993 when he urinated into the
piece and attacked it with a hammer, while it was on display in
Nimes, in southern France) and he made promise of action
(multiple). Lebon asked for heavy weight security bouncers to
stand by the Fountain, as he wanted it exhibited without a
papal-like glass cage. Pinoncelli got through.
Pierre Doze: You
have been hit a lot harder this time around—3 months
probation and a fine of 200,000 Euros ($260,000).
Pierre Pinoncelli: It’s heresy. You can’t fix a Ready
Made. That’s a complete negation of Duchamp’s
principles! Yet they fixed it and displayed it, and made no
mention of the its history or my action. I don’t consider
vandalism to be my specialty. I don’t have an inherent
interest in destruction. Yet, tranquility is not much my taste
either. I had the choice of spending the last of my days
peacefully or actively. I chose the option of activity, the
heroic character. Performance evokes childhood to me. I decided
not to say anything to my wife or children. After my previous
attack on the Fountain, I had promised that that would be the
last. They are all very angry. This time is one time too many.
Seen from the outside, this can all seem very funny. Yet at
home, even after my first action, it was a disaster: The house
was mortgaged, provisional prosecution measures taken; constant
visits from bailiffs ... at that time, only your kids see you
as Zorro. Now for the first time in my life I have a criminal
record. Even back when I held up a bank, they didn’t do
this to me.
PD: You
have moved from an artist to news item. Are you not concerned
that this Fountain will be your coffin, and that your name will
be no more than an accessory to Duchamp’s work.
PP: Actually,
I have done many different things in performance and painting.
In 67, I was in NY for the opening of an Yves Klein exhibition
at the Jewish Museum. I was disguised as a blue man, which made
the headlines of the Village Voice. This is when I met Duchamp.
I told him of my plan to destroy the urinal. He laughed and
encouraged me.
PD: Do
you see that as regression?
PP: That
this Institutional Museum stays silent as to the history of
this piece, that’s pretty lame. I am quite aware that the
stakes are much higher. Dada, Duchamp, and the Pompidou Center,
that’s quite high. I had killed the urinal. It was
nothing more than a serialized object, without a past, no
scars, all smooth. I managed to get away with it the first time
in 93, by making the insurance company that was after me
understand that you can’t go after an artist. This time,
they didn’t miss their shot. My lawyer is more or less
optimistic. I’m a serial killer every 13 years. I’m
going to have to pay high.
featured in Issue
9
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|




